Jump to content
  • We'd love for you to participate.

    Create an account

    Ask questions, share experiences and connect.

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
  • Sign in to follow this  

    Bills proposed to close cruise line tax loopholes. Voice your opinion!

    Frequent industry critic Sen. Jay Rockefeller IV made good on his threat and introduced two bills designed to force cruise lines to pay more in U.S. taxes. “The cruise industry can’t operate for free here in the U.S.” Rockefeller said in a press release. “It costs money to send the Coast Guard to tow their drifting ships and it costs money to maintain the ports they use. Cruise lines need to start paying their fair share of taxes and stop expecting everyone else to foot the bill.”

    Rockefeller introduced bills that would no longer exempt cruise lines — U.S.-based but registered in other countries — from paying taxes on income sourced in the U.S. He also calls for a 5 percent excise tax on gross income from cruises that begin or end in the U.S. to help fund national transportation infrastructure improvements.

    Rockefeller said a review of SEC documents found that the two largest public cruise companies, Carnival Corp. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., paid an effective worldwide tax rate of just 1.3 percent on more than $17 billion in profits over the past seven years.

    According to a summary of the bills, foreign corporations are not subject to U.S. taxes on income derived from the international operation of ships, even if the source of the income is in the U. S. The exemption was granted to avoid foreign companies being taxed by multiple countries and an expectation that non­U.S. corporations would be taxed in their home countries. “However, this has not proven to be the case for the cruise industry, and this is not likely to change,” Rockefeller’s summary asserts. “Based on cruise industry SEC filings, the (Senate’s commerce, science and transportation) committee has learned that the cruise companies pay little to no corporate income tax in their home countries. Given that these companies — whose headquarters and CEOs are located in the U.S — are largely transporting U.S. passengers to and from locations in the U.S., with the assistance and oversight of U.S. agencies, this special tax treatment is clearly unjustified.”

    When asked for a reaction, the Cruise Lines International Association said it was reviewing the proposed legislation and did not have an immediate comment. RCCL referred questions to CLIA while Norwegian Cruise Line did not immediately respond.

    However, Carnival Corp. & plc said it has paid $1.2 billion in the past five years to U.S. federal, state and local agencies, including port authority payments, government fees, dockage fees and payroll taxes. “Carnival Corporation pays the taxes it is legally required to pay in every country in which we do business,” the company said in a statement. “In addition, virtually all jurisdictions where our ships call impose taxes and/or fees based on the guest counts, ship tonnage, ship capacity or some other measurement. These taxes are included in our cost of operation.”

    Carnival also said the majority of its income is earned outside of the U.S. The corporation operates several international brands that are headquartered in the U.K., Germany, Italy, Spain and Australia. Carnival Corp. & plc includes Carnival Cruise Lines, Holland America Line, Princess Cruises, Seabourn, AIDA Cruises, Costa Cruises, Cunard, Ibero Cruises, P&O Cruises (U.K.) and P&O Cruises (Australia).

    By Theresa Norton Masek, Travel Pulse

    For more cruise news & articles go to http://www.cruisecrazies.com/index.html

    Re-posted on CruiseCrazies.com - Cruise News, Articles, Forums, Packing List, Ship Tracker, and more


    Sign in to follow this  

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Senator Rockefeller needs to consider a much bigger picture. In every home port that cruise lines sail from in the US there is a HUGE economic impact and virtually no cost to the community. Driving up taxes on cruise lines could well force the lines to abandon some ports where the profits aren't very high in favor of those where they make a better margin. The end result would be significant economic impact to those communities including lost jobs, lost tax revenue, lost payments to the Port Authorities.

    Sen. Rockefeller seems to think that cruise line guests are as privileged as he is and can spare the additional cost of taxes that will certainly be passed on by the cruise lines. The fact of the matter is that for a great many people who sail it's a 'once in a lifetime' experience. Senator, take a look at the amount of money owed the taxpayers by General Motors... consider that massive amount of money thrown down the drain as part of the 'stimulus' plan.

    Clean your own house before you attempt to raid ours.

    ...I'm off my soap box now...

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Cruise Secrets Revealed!
  • Create New...