Jump to content
  • We'd love for you to participate.

    Create an account

    Ask questions, share experiences and connect.

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

B.C. waters a free toilet for U.S. cruise ships

Rate this topic


Jason

Recommended Posts

B.C. waters a free toilet for U.S. cruise ships

Nicholas Read, Vancouver Sun[/size]

A U.S. cruise line fined $100,000 US for discharging untreated effluent into waters off the coast of Washington state would have got off scot-free had the effluent been discharged into Canadian waters, a company official said Wednesday.

Celebrity Cruises received the fine from the Washington state Department of Ecology for discharging untreated wastewater into Washington waters on 10 separate occasions in September and October of 2005. But the company's director of environmental programs, Rich Pruitt, said if the discharges had occurred in Canadian waters, they would have been perfectly legal.

"If they had all been in Canadian territorial waters, then they would have complied with Canadian guidelines," Pruitt said.

Officials at Transport Canada confirmed that, saying Canada has only unenforceable guidelines surrounding the discharge of waste water into Canadian oceans, and no system of fines or penalties.

That has environmentalists aghast.

"It's quite appalling," said Jennifer Lash, executive director of the Living Oceans Society.

"Not only that, it's embarrassing. To think that in the U.S. they've put regulations into place to deal with this, and in Canada they've failed to. It's completely irresponsible of Transport Canada."

Celebrity Cruises, which is based in Miami, Fla., has asked officials to reduce the $100,000 penalty because it believed that three of the 10 discharges took place in Canadian waters.

It claims navigational notations by Washington state officials led them to conclude incorrectly that all 10 discharges took place in Washington water.

The material in question consisted mainly of so-called "grey water," meaning waste water from the ship's showers, sinks, galleys and laundry, Pruitt said. But it also included some treated sewage, or "black water."

According to proposed new Canadian government regulations introduced in July, ships over 400 tonnes will no longer be allowed to dump raw sewage directly into the sea within 12 nautical miles (22 kilometres) of Canada's coast.

But Transport Canada has no rules governing the disposal of grey water or treated black water, only voluntary guidelines.

They say the ship must be moving at a speed of not less than six knots, that it not be in port and that it not be within four nautical miles of the coast.

However, because they are only guidelines, there is no penalty for failing to obey them, said Transport Canada spokesman Rod Nelson.

For that reason, Ross Klein, a professor of sociology at Memorial University in Newfoundland who has written three books on the cruise ship industry, calls B.C. "the toilet between Alaska and Washington State."

"[Canadian governments] basically look the other way," Klein said.

"The way they justify it is that Victoria dumps untreated sewage into the ocean, so how can they regulate the cruise industry?"

He said there have even been times when cruise ships have dumped untreated waste water into Canadian oceans and reported it.

"But nothing was done about it," Klein added.

"To find there's nothing there in terms of managing this issue shows it's even worse than I thought," Lash said. "If they're dumping into waters here and contaminating them, that's a real problem."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically in U.S. waters they get fined rather heavily but here at home (B.C) they don't. That doesn't make a lot of sense. I think the fines should be the same no matter what waters they are in. But then we Canadians take a lot of ^%$& from the rest of the world especially with our (non-existant) immigration policy. No matter what you've done or what you do once you get here - you're welcome to stay.

Also if Celebrity got fined ten separate times for the same thing - I guess they are not taking it too seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...